The Theory of Society  by Wayne M. Angel, Ph.D.

Relation Dynamics: Relation Distance and Interaction

















F















 
Home

The Quest - A Preface

About This Site

Optimal Leadership

The Theory of Society
  Introduction
  Evolutionary Society
  Relation Dynamics

    Introduction
    Entity Abstraction Model
    The Relation Coordinate System
    Inertia, Momentum and Force
    Relation Distance and Interaction
    Work and Conservation of Energy
    Constraints
    Lagrange's Equations
    The Hamiltonian
    Physical Interpretation

  Relation Thermodynamics
  Memetics
  Wants
  Mimetics
  Decision Making
  All the Rest of Psychology
  Operations Model
  Theory Verification
  Forecasting


Organization Simulations

SignPost Technologies
                    & Services


Utopian Dreams

The Android Project

 
Discussion Forum
About the Author
Contact Me

If there is no relation between to entities then the relation distance will be infinite and there will be no interaction.  However, the converse is not true.  A finite relation distance does not imply an interaction.  This is very similar to the situation with correlation, in that correlation does not imply a causation relationship.  The behavior of two entities may be correlated or have a finite relation distance and not be casually connected.  The correlation or the relation distance may be due to an interaction with a third party.  An example may be useful.

Consider 4 persons interacting; A, B, C, and D.  The specific interaction does not matter, however the relation distance will apply only for the specific type of interaction.  Possible examples are eating a meal together, having sex, playing chess, etc. 

Case #1

  • A and B interact 1 out of every 100 hours.
  • C and D interact 1 out of every 100 hours.
  • No other interactions between these 4 persons. 

Case #2

  • A and B interact 1 out of every 100 hours.
  • B and C interact 1 out of every 100 hours.
  • C and D interact 1 out of every 100 hours.
  • No other interactions between these 4 persons. 

We can calculate the value of J, and the correlation between each pair combination of persons as follows.  I have also calculated, which can be thought of as the correlation distance just a  is defined as the IDA relation distance or.

 

 

Case #1

A-B and C-D

Case #2

A-B, B-C, and C-D

Pairings

J

J

AB

0.080793

12.37729

1

1

0.060793

16.44923

0.703526

2.020408

AC

0

0

0.000293

3413.603

-0.00718

19404

AD

0

0

0.000146

6862.04

0

BC

0

0

0.04094

24.42578

0.489796

4.168403

BD

0

0

0.000293

3413.603

-0.00718

19404

CD

0.080793

12.37729

1

1

0.060793

16.44923

0.703526

2.020408

Relation Distance Example

In Case #1 where our 4 persons are divided into 2 couples and there is no interactions between the couples then J and =0 and the distances are infinite except for the A-B and C-D interactions.  When in Case #2 we introduce an interaction between B and C, we have J > 0 for all pairings and is finite. 

This example shows that both J and  can non-zero even when there is no direct interaction.  One should also note that changing a relation distance causes other relation distances to change such as the A-B relation distance going from 12.37729 to 16.44923 when the B-C relation distance is changed.  This is similar to the physical dynamics situation that when the distance between 2 objects is changed by moving one of the objects all of the distances between that object and other objects change.  That is one cannot change just a single physical or single relation distance.  In the case of physical dynamics we see this intuitively because of the 3 dimensional structure of the space that physical objects must occupy.  The situation in relation space is a bit more complex and not so intuitively clear.

ç  Prior Page of Text     Next Page of Text è
(C) 2005-2014 Wayne M. Angel.  All rights reserved.